I read a fascinating article on Gizmodo about the new words and phrases that will get your article banned from the US Government. Censorship comes in many ways, here is another interesting one.
The List of Trump’s Forbidden Words That Will Get Your Paper Flagged at NSF has a fascinating new spin on the New Speak of this new regime.
As my writing skills have improved lately, I asked ChatGPT to write a four-paragraph commentary on Censorship and its perils, and it gave me the following: Yes, this is AI-generated text. Sorry.
AI’s Perspectives on Censorship
Censorship poses a significant threat to advocacy and activism, particularly when it silences diverse groups striving for equity and social justice. Historically, marginalized communities—including BIPOC, the LGBTQ+ community, and individuals with disabilities—have faced barriers to having their voices heard due to institutional biases and discriminatory policies. By suppressing discussions around racial inequality, gender diversity, and socioeconomic disparities, censorship reinforces systemic inequities and hinders efforts toward fostering inclusivity. When advocates for diversity and inclusion are silenced, the progress toward equitable policies and culturally responsive practices is stifled, further marginalizing already underserved populations.
One of the most insidious aspects of censorship is its implicit biases, which are often biased toward protecting privileged groups while silencing those advocating for change. When discussions on racial justice, discrimination, and equal opportunity are curtailed, it becomes difficult to address inequitable systems that perpetuate racial and gender disparities. This not only excludes historically underrepresented voices but also prevents meaningful conversations about community equity and cultural differences. By limiting discourse, censorship upholds stereotypes, undermining efforts to diversify leadership and ensure fair representation for women, the Hispanic minority, and other historically undervalued groups.
Furthermore, censorship exacerbates polarization by preventing a diversified exchange of ideas and perspectives. In an era where promoting diversity and fostering inclusivity are crucial, suppressing conversations about race and ethnicity, disabilities, and gender equality only deepens societal divides. Activists and advocacy groups working to increase the diversity of representation in politics, media, and education often face resistance when their efforts challenge dominant narratives. This resistance not only limits public awareness of social justice issues but also restricts the ability to enhance the diversity of thought in a multicultural society.
Ultimately, censorship is a barrier to true inclusivity, preventing underrepresented voices from contributing to a more just and equitable society. By silencing discussions on systemic inequities, discrimination, and racial diversity, it denies individuals a sense of belonging and obstructs efforts to diversify institutions and communities. Advocacy for a more inclusive world requires open dialogue, where individuals from diverse backgrounds can challenge implicit biases, confront prejudices, and advocate for institutional change. Only by rejecting censorship and embracing free expression can we work toward a society that values every individual, regardless of race, gender, disability, or socioeconomic status.
Written by ChatGPT using the following prompt: “Please take the following list and create a 4 paragraph commentary on the perils of censorship, which includes as many of these words as possible.”
I’d say that was not bad at all, and hopefully I have trained ChatGPT a bit more, in process.
Keywords? Censorship, Artificial Intelligence, Free Speech, Algorithm Bias, Digital Rights, Big Tech, Online Moderation, AI Ethics, Content Suppression, Freedom of Expression